Shit it's been months, guess i really have problems with consistency, nevertheless, here comes the final part of my stupid posts about anarcho libertarianism. I don't know why but i find it very hard to properly construct this post, been rereading it for tens of times and still can't find a single good structurization. It's not that i'm saying my previous writings are in good structure, it's just very hard to actually get good coherent connections for the points of this post. Fuck it aight.
So most part of this post, for instance the materials, the bottom lines, the main ideas, have already been on the draft since the next 2 weeks after i publish the last part. Yet how come it took months to finish this one? It was of course a matter of will and enthusiasm and chips and masturbations, but most important of all, i was thinking very carefully about the potential inconsistencies regarding the arguments i built in the previous posts (i was just trying to be consistent, even on my fallacies).
So, the consistency that i was trying to keep on building the understandings and arguments upon the solution of anarcho libertarianism is about the statement that i threw on the last post, which is the notion of liberty and not taking it to the philosophical level since it will all become much too absurd. On the other hand, in this post, i'm striking the solution of 'educated society', which of course is intertwined with liberty, in the philosophical fashion. But now i'm pretty sure that this post is not entirely about taking the semantics of liberty to the contexts of absurd conceptions, that means, it's fairly okay to take the notion of liberty to some certain philosophical level to elaborate my arguments only in this regard, though it may, one way or another, be fallacious to my own train of thoughts.
Well whatever, i played too much dota and chess, that's why it took months, but yes i really thought deeply about the inconsistency, and second guessing myself that this philosophical argument about education is a MacGuffin of my perspective on decoding austrian school. I FEEL CHEAP.
So most part of this post, for instance the materials, the bottom lines, the main ideas, have already been on the draft since the next 2 weeks after i publish the last part. Yet how come it took months to finish this one? It was of course a matter of will and enthusiasm and chips and masturbations, but most important of all, i was thinking very carefully about the potential inconsistencies regarding the arguments i built in the previous posts (i was just trying to be consistent, even on my fallacies).
So, the consistency that i was trying to keep on building the understandings and arguments upon the solution of anarcho libertarianism is about the statement that i threw on the last post, which is the notion of liberty and not taking it to the philosophical level since it will all become much too absurd. On the other hand, in this post, i'm striking the solution of 'educated society', which of course is intertwined with liberty, in the philosophical fashion. But now i'm pretty sure that this post is not entirely about taking the semantics of liberty to the contexts of absurd conceptions, that means, it's fairly okay to take the notion of liberty to some certain philosophical level to elaborate my arguments only in this regard, though it may, one way or another, be fallacious to my own train of thoughts.
Well whatever, i played too much dota and chess, that's why it took months, but yes i really thought deeply about the inconsistency, and second guessing myself that this philosophical argument about education is a MacGuffin of my perspective on decoding austrian school. I FEEL CHEAP.